Get your free chapter
In ePUB or Kindle-format



 

Power to the human rights

The world may be shaken out of the grip of dictators, especially in the Muslim world, the dedication of independent human rights organizations is needed more then ever. The economic crisis steps up the pressure. The yet to materialize new democratic societies are no guarantee for the freedom of opinion and expression (art. 19 UDHR). It’s no guarantee either for the fair treatment of the defeated opponents. What really happens is often less clear compared to the dictatorial days. In the path to democracy it’s as if it’s easier to annihilate the opponents, from fear of resurrection, but also out of revenge. Quasi fair trials are no guarantee for the truth to come out. There is not very often much wisdom in them either. The euphoria about the end of the former dictatorships shifts to the blurring confusion of how to deal with the near and not so near future.

Principal grounds

The ultimate respect for the freedom of opinion and expression and an independent and fair judicial system are fundamental to any future development, as is the unconditional separation of religious, state and judicial powers. The current development to accept more or less the mingling of these powers must be rejected on principal grounds. In these transitional times some human rights organizations contribute to the confusion by accommodating an attitude that might appear loose if it comes to human rights. Only a pure and principal attitude give human rights organizations, such as Amnesty International, their reputation and respect. We are well aware of the fact that China is quite different from The Netherlands or the United States of America, but this cannot be a pretext for human rights organizations to accept the violation of human rights. Even if this means losing territory.

Occidental doctrine

Are the principals invested in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the dogmas of the developed world? Does the developed world force these principals upon all the reluctant others? This is highly unlikely. Even if there should be any truth in this “Occidental doctrine”, it still is a drive for universal values such as the freedom of religion, the freedom of opinion and expression, the freedom of organization, the integrity of the individual, equality of the sexes, a fair trial. Moreover a transparent society is one of the most important preconditions for the establishment and protection of the fundamental human rights as they are laid down in the declaration.

No compromise

Committed human rights organizations do not compromise to these fundamental rights, as they do not compromise to the truth and the search for the truth. The rise of a growing number of human rights organizations may appear to be a boon to the world, but it’s also a cause for some concern. Some of these organizations stem from powers that take the universal rights lightly, to say the least. Some doubt can be cast on their independent status. Furthermore, it’s urgent that human rights organizations join hands worldwide to avoid the watering down of their message. It’s as important as their grass roots character. As it is important that human rights organizations focus on national and international governments as well as on national and multinational companies. If it comes to subsistence of a civil society in which the fundamental human rights stand at the core no compromise is justified.

Bert Breij, Amsterdam

Leave a Reply